Monorepo: Pros and Cons

A monorepo is a version control repository that contains multiple projects and packages that are often related and share dependencies. In the context of Node.js applications, a monorepo is a single repository containing multiple Node.js projects, each with its dependencies and builds.

Advantages of using a monorepo for Node.js applications include:

  • Centralized management of dependencies

  • Improved collaboration and communication among teams working on different projects

  • Faster builds and reduced storage space due to shared dependencies

  • Simplified testing and deployment processes

To set up a monorepo for Node.js applications, you can use tools such as Lerna or Nx. These tools help manage the dependencies and builds of the individual projects within the monorepo.

For example, with Nx, you can create a new monorepo by using the Nx CLI and then adding your Node.js projects as individual workspaces within the monorepo. You can also manage dependencies and builds using Nx, making it a convenient tool for managing a monorepo for Node.js applications.

Life with a monorepo

A monorepo makes sense in the following scenarios:

  1. Large organizations with multiple projects: If you have a large organization with multiple teams working on different projects, a monorepo can help centralize the management of dependencies and improve communication among teams.

  2. Shared libraries or microservices: If you have a collection of microservices or shared libraries that are tightly related, a monorepo can help manage their dependencies and builds in a centralized manner.

  3. Easy maintenance and deployment: A monorepo makes it easier to deploy and maintain the projects within it, as all the projects share a single version control repository and can be deployed as a single unit.

  4. Faster builds: By sharing dependencies among projects, a monorepo can reduce the time it takes to build each project, as dependencies do not need to be built and installed for each project.

Life without a monorepo

It's worth noting that a monorepo is not always the best choice, and there are some drawbacks to using a monorepo, such as increased complexity and longer build times when the number of projects grows. It is important to weigh the pros and cons and determine whether a monorepo is the right choice for your organization.

  1. Small projects or teams: If you have a small project with a small team, a monorepo may add unnecessary complexity and overhead. In such cases, a single repository for each project may be sufficient.

  2. Independent projects with little interdependence: If you have multiple projects that have little interdependence and do not share common libraries or dependencies, it may be easier to manage each project in a separate repository.

  3. Projects with different release cycles: If you have projects that have different release cycles and require independent versioning, it may be better to manage each project in a separate repository to ensure that each project can be released and versioned independently.

  4. Need for isolation: If you have projects that need to be isolated from each other for security or compliance reasons, it may be better to manage each project in a separate repository.

  5. Performance concerns: Monorepos can become very large and complex as the number of projects grows, leading to longer build times and increased complexity. In such cases, a separate repository for each project may be a better choice.

In general, evaluating your organization's and projects' specific needs and requirements is essential before deciding whether a monorepo is the right choice.

Available Tools

There are several tools available for managing a monorepo for Node.js applications, including:

  1. Lerna: A popular tool for managing a monorepo, Lerna allows you to manage multiple packages within a single repository and provides features such as versioning, linking, and publishing of packages.

  2. Nx: An open-source set of tools and practices for monorepos, Nx provides a suite of tools for managing a monorepo, including a CLI, a set of libraries, and a dev server. Nx is designed specifically for Angular and Node.js applications.

  3. Yarn Workspaces: A feature of the Yarn package manager, Yarn Workspaces allows you to manage multiple packages within a single repository and share dependencies between packages.

  4. Rush: A fast and flexible monorepo manager for Windows, Mac, and Linux, Rush provides tools for managing a monorepo and supports multiple programming languages, including Node.js.

  5. Pnpm: An alternative package manager for Node.js, Pnpm provides support for monorepos and features such as fast installation and efficient storage of packages.

It's worth noting that each tool has its own set of features and limitations, and it's important to evaluate the specific needs of your organization and projects before deciding which tool is the best fit.

Did you find this article valuable?

Support Vitor Magalhães by becoming a sponsor. Any amount is appreciated!